Skip to content

📖 HIPA: Hybrid Influence Pattern Atlas - Core Tactics

OTFR Core Principle: You need only recognize the pattern; you do not have to diagnose the actor’s intent.

The 80/20 Rule of Cognitive Immunity

By mastering just these six Core Tactics (the 20% of effort), you gain the ability to recognize, neutralize, and build immunity against the vast majority of malicious influence operations (the 80% payoff).

Tier 1: Root Vectors (The Strategic Goal)

The Root Vectors are the high-level, overarching goals of all influence operations. They are not the methods used (that is Tier 2), but the desired outcome for the adversary: to break down the ability of a society or individual to function rationally and cohesively.

Mastering these three vectors helps you understand the true objective behind the manipulation you encounter.

1. Erosion of Trust (The Belief Vector)

Goal: To systematically destroy confidence in all reliable institutions, processes, and sources of truth. Mechanism: This vector uses tactics that target Source & Reputation (e.g., Counterfeit Sources, Manufactured Certainty) to make the user believe that experts are biased, science is corrupt, and media is hostile. Ultimate Outcome: An individual who trusts only isolated, self-selected information sources, making them susceptible to control. Core Question: Can I trust what they are telling me?

2. Cognitive Paralysis (The Action Vector)

Goal: To overwhelm the target with complexity, noise, and conflicting data until they cease rational decision-making and action entirely. Mechanism: This vector utilizes tactics that target clarity and resolve (e.g., Ambiguity Projection, Flooding/Oversaturation) to induce a state of learned helplessness. Ultimate Outcome: An individual who feels the problem is "too big" or "too complicated" to solve, leading to inaction and apathy. Core Question: Can I understand this well enough to act?

3. Manufactured Polarization (The Social Vector)

Goal: To break down social cohesion by creating extreme, artificial conflicts and driving wedges between groups. Mechanism: This vector employs tactics that rely on exclusion and antagonism (e.g., False Dichotomy Trap, Inversion/DARVO) to replace mutual understanding with suspicion and outrage. Ultimate Outcome: A fractured society where collective resilience and problem-solving are impossible, and every issue becomes a zero-sum conflict. Core Question: Are "we" fundamentally opposed to "them"?

Tier 2: The Master Patterns (The 80/20 Toolkit)

These are the primary mechanisms used to disarm rational thought.

1. The False Dichotomy Trap (Formerly: Bilateral Deletion)

Focus: Creating a Limited Choice.

The deliberate exclusion of facts inconvenient to both polarized sides of a narrative. This maintains a false conflict where only two extreme options appear to exist, paralyzing action by forcing you to choose between two bad choices.

  • Recognition Heuristic: Ask: "What relevant facts is neither side mentioning?"
  • Danger Signal: You feel forced to choose one of two extreme, uncomfortable options.
  • Counter-Move: Pause and list missing third options or excluded facts.
  • Goal: Maintain conflict and suppress practical solutions. (Serves Manufactured Polarization)

2. Inversion (The DARVO Pattern)

Focus: Reversing the Roles.

Deny, Attack the messenger/victim, and Reverse Victim and Offender roles. The aggressor claims to be the real victim, forcing the truth-teller into a defensive posture.

  • Recognition Heuristic: Does the defense involve personal attacks or a sudden claim of victimhood by the alleged wrongdoer?
  • Danger Signal: You feel confused, defensive, and suddenly on the back foot after presenting a simple fact.
  • Counter-Move: Refocus on the original evidence and ignore the personal attack.
  • Goal: Distract the public, and emotionally drain the truth-teller. (Serves Erosion of Trust)

3. Ambiguity Projection

Focus: Complexity for Paralysis.

Using intentionally vague, jargon-filled, or overly complex language to make a clear issue seem hopelessly complicated. This induces learned helplessness, paralyzing the public's ability to form a decision or take action.

  • Recognition Heuristic: If you read something and feel completely overwhelmed and unsure where to start, you might be a target.
  • Danger Signal: The content shifts abruptly into technical jargon once challenged, or relies heavily on credentials instead of evidence.
  • Counter-Move: Demand clarity: "What is the simple, core action required?"
  • Goal: Prevent public action by making the problem appear too complex to solve. (Serves Cognitive Paralysis)

4. Manufactured Certainty

Focus: False Confidence.

The technique of presenting speculative or unverified claims with an air of absolute, dogmatic certainty. This suppresses rational inquiry by implying the issue is "settled" and that any question is hostile.

  • Recognition Heuristic: Look for absolutes: "The Science is Settled," "The Only True Answer." Check the source's credentials outside the immediate platform.
  • Danger Signal: The claim discourages questions or suggests the issue is beyond further debate.
  • Counter-Move: Apply the Context Check (Verification Protocol Step 3) and search for peer review status.
  • Goal: Replace informed consent with dogmatic compliance. (Serves Erosion of Trust)

5. The Counterfeit Source (Formerly: Simulacra/Clones)

Focus: Credibility Hijacking.

Creating a high-fidelity replica (a clone or simulacrum) of a widely trusted source (website, document, or identity) to spread false information under the guise of legitimacy.

  • Recognition Heuristic: Check the URL for subtle misspellings (e.g., treemagik.org). Check if the About/Contact pages look autogenerated or are missing.
  • Danger Signal: The source looks real, but the content is inflammatory or breaks the source's usual tone.
  • Counter-Move: Apply the Source & Reputation Check (Verification Protocol Step 2) immediately. Search for the exact headline on the legitimate website.
  • Goal: Transfer the credibility of a trusted institution to malicious content. (Serves Erosion of Trust)

6. Flooding / Oversaturation (Bonus Tactic)

Focus: Overwhelming the Senses.

Overwhelming the information environment with so much noise, low-grade content, or contradictory narratives that truth becomes impossible to identify. This induces a sense of apathy and mental exhaustion.

  • Recognition Heuristic: You encounter 5-10 conflicting, poor-quality articles on the same topic within a short period.
  • Danger Signal: You feel overwhelmed, apathetic, and decide the issue is "too complicated" to bother with.
  • Counter-Move: Step away entirely. Re-read the Stop the Scroll (Protocol Step 1) and follow your Pre-Bunking Diet for the next 24 hours.
  • Goal: Cause cognitive paralysis and disengagement. (Serves Cognitive Paralysis)

Making HIPA Accessible: The Quick-Reference Kit

1. The HIPA Wallet Card (Summary)

Tactic Focus/Nickname Danger Signal Counter-Move
1. False Dichotomy Trap Limited Choice Forced choice between two extremes. List missing third options.
2. Inversion (DARVO) Role Reversal You feel defensive after stating a fact. Refocus on original evidence.
3. Ambiguity Projection Complexity Paralysis You feel overwhelmed by jargon. Demand the simple core action.
4. Manufactured Certainty False Confidence The claim discourages any questions. Apply Protocol Step 3 (Context).
5. Counterfeit Source Lookalike Lie URL has misspellings or odd tone. Apply Protocol Step 2 (Source).
6. Flooding / Oversaturation Overwhelming Noise You feel apathetic or mentally exhausted. Step away entirely; limit news intake.

2. Diagnostic Flow: How to Use the Atlas (A Quick-Start Guide)

This integrates the Protocol and the Atlas into a simple defense drill.

  1. Stop the Emotional Hook (Protocol Step 1): Take a breath. Do not click yet.
  2. Scan the Content: Determine the strategic goal (Tier 1) and the specific method (Tier 2).
  3. Name It: Which of the six patterns is at work? (E.g., "This is using a False Dichotomy Trap to achieve Manufactured Polarization.")
  4. Apply the Counter-Move: Use the specific counter-move listed in the Atlas to break the pattern's spell.
  5. Apply the Verification Protocol (Steps 2-5): Once the pattern is neutralized, use the S-S-C-C-V checklist to verify the facts and issue the final VERIFY or VETO.